Skip to main content
Search
Cart 0
0

User account menu

  • Sign In

Main navigation

Sign In
  • About us
    • About ALI Overview
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Governance
      • Governance
      • Officers
      • Council
      • Committees
        • Committees
        • Standing Committees
        • Special Committees
        • Joint Committees
    • Awards
      • Awards
      • Henry J. Friendly Medal
      • John Minor Wisdom Award
      • Distinguished Service Award
      • Reporter's Chairs
      • Early Career Scholars Medal
    • Contact Us
      • Contact Us
      • ALI Staff
      • Employment Opportunites
    • ALI CLE
    • Video Library
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • Get Email Updates
    • Trial Manual Electronic Publication
    • Style Manual
    • Reprint Permission
    • Publications FAQ
    • Customer Service
  • Projects
    • All Projects
    • Project Life Cycle
    • Style Manual
  • Meetings
    • All Meetings
    • Health and Safety
  • Members
    • Members Overview
    • About Our Members
      • About Our Members
      • In Memoriam
      • Regional Advisory Groups
      • Milestones
      • Newly Elected Members
    • Member Directory
    • Make a Gift
    • Membership FAQ
  • Giving
    • Giving Overview
    • Annual Fund
    • 100 for 100
    • Member Giving Circles
    • Life Member Class Gift
      • Life Member Class Gift
      • 2000 Life Member Class Gift
      • 1999 Life Member Class Gift
    • Sustaining Members
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Law Firm Giving
    • Fundraising Disclosure Statement
    • Contact Us
  • News
    • News
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Podcast
    • Press Releases
    • Video Library
    • Annual Reports
    • ALI In the Courts
    • ALI CLE Programs
Donate
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Curtis Karnow on “Scholars as Amici”
Home Curtis Karnow on “Scholars as Amici”
  1. News
Member News

Curtis Karnow on “Scholars as Amici”

February 05, 2021

Curtis E.A. Karnow of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, has authored “Scholars as Amici” in The Green Bag's Autumn 2020 issue.  

In the piece, Judge Karnow offers a unique definition of a scholarly paper and compares their purpose and use to briefs of amici curiae.  

The following is an excerpt:  

You can say what you want on scholarly papers. Are you reporting a consensus? An historical review of what the term has meant over the last 200 years? Are you reporting what some famous or smart person once said? Or are you sending out a prayer, a plea, a hope?  

I am hoping. So here’s how I define a scholarly paper: 

A scholarly paper – in the legal world – is one which provides context and background for trial orders and other judicial opinions. It doesn’t matter where it’s published. It could itself be a court opinion. It might be on legal issues and often is, but not necessarily, because it might be directed to statistics, DNA, privacy, computers, medicine, or accounting. In any event the paper is directed to judges, and so is of interest to lawyers who want to persuade judges. 

It’s a broad category. 

In this country, court decisions are usually informed only by a few private parties with private interests, but the results are precedential – everyone else has to live with the consequences. Public policy issues which in other governments are relegated to bureaucracies and other (perhaps elected) officials are in the United States given over to courts. Problems arise where judges have broad powers on public issues but are informed only by private parties. Blend in the fact that trial judges (and to a lesser extent appellate judges) don’t have time to investigate all aspects and ramifications of their decisions, and we have a sometimes toxic brew. 

This might bring into question the legitimacy of the courts’ decisions. And private parties concerned that courts will import public policy to decide their private dispute may try to opt out of the court system – e.g., for arbitration. But in the United States there’s no line between private and public: even contract disputes, where the parties have the broadest range of options to set their own rules, are subject to constraints such as voiding unconscionable provisions. 

Scholarly papers, like briefs of amici curiae, ameliorate these problems. They focus on broader issues, likely not briefed by the parties and requiring too much work to figure out in the context of a single case. The papers might address the development of a statute, or the last fifty years of appellate opinions on an issue. This is useful because courts might not have the time to do this themselves, and because scholars think of things that judges don’t.  

Read the full piece.

More News

See All

Erik Knutsen Unpacks Insurance Law’s Broad Reach

Nanette Jolivette Brown Inducted into Tulane Law Hall of Fame

Judy Perry Martinez to Receive 2025 American Inns of Court James E. Coleman Jr. Award for Professionalism in the Fifth Circuit

Address

4025 Chestnut Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19104

215-243-1600

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
Donate

© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved.