Supreme Court of India Opinion Cites Laura Little
In a recent Supreme Court of India decision on India's judicial appointment process, the Supreme Court of India relied extensively on scholarship by ALI member Professor Laura Little of Temple University Beasley School of Law. Professor Little is also an Associate Reporter on the Restatement of the Law Third, Conflict of Laws project.
The 4:1 opinion rejected an act and constitutional amendment that would have given politicians control over judicial appointments, similar to the nomination and confirmation process used in the United States. The Court quoted Professor Little’s scholarship on judicial independence, and the “complex problem posed by moral issues of gratitude and loyalty to judges who ‘owe’ their jobs to political benefactors." Professor Little’s article, Loyalty, Gratitude, and the Federal Judiciary, deals with the topic at issue, with reference to appointment of judges.
"This complexity emerges," Professor Little wrote, "to a great degree from the process of nomination and confirmation, which often generates, or at least reinforces, a judge's sense of loyalty and gratitude to her benefactors. … To omit from these concerns the effect of any change on the ultimate quality of judicial decisionmaking would, of course, be a mistake. Thus, in studying any new selection procedure, we must contemplate the procedure's potential for creating and invigorating a judge's feelings of loyalty and gratitude to her benefactors. The foregoing should, therefore, not only shed light on the process of federal court decisionmaking in general, but also give much needed guidance for evaluating proposed changes to judicial selection."
Read full opinion here.
- . @BandesSusan of @DePaulLaw was interviewed by @Law360 on her article “Empath and Remote Legal Proceedings” discuss… https://t.co/oB4452EN6H@AmLawInstJul 30
- . @OlatiJ was featured on the final episode of the Defending the Planet podcast by @ColumbiaLaw discussing climate c… https://t.co/YgGaOJZxY7@AmLawInstJul 29
- . @ChrisOdinet was quoted in @MorningConsult on potential consequences for nonbank and fintech mortgage companies as… https://t.co/xYP2kLfTZu@AmLawInstJul 28
- Jane Cutler Greenspan, retired judge of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, discusses Title IX adjudication and reso… https://t.co/x6F7Lmx5vS@AmLawInstJul 27
- . @daniellecitron participated in a discussion with @TheProspect analyzing the different facets of Section 230, a pr… https://t.co/NAxmfwB7em@AmLawInstJul 26