Skip to main content
Search
Cart 0
0

User account menu

  • Sign In

Main navigation

Sign In
  • About us
    • About ALI Overview
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Governance
      • Governance
      • Officers
      • Council
      • Committees
        • Committees
        • Standing Committees
        • Special Committees
        • Joint Committees
    • Awards
      • Awards
      • Henry J. Friendly Medal
      • John Minor Wisdom Award
      • Distinguished Service Award
      • Reporter's Chairs
      • Early Career Scholars Medal
    • Contact Us
      • Contact Us
      • ALI Staff
      • Employment Opportunites
    • ALI CLE
    • Video Library
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • Get Email Updates
    • Resources for Librarians
    • Trial Manual Electronic Publication
    • Style Manual
    • Reprint Permission
    • Publications FAQ
    • Customer Service
  • Projects
    • All Projects
    • Project Life Cycle
    • Style Manual
  • Meetings
    • All Meetings
    • Health and Safety
  • Members
    • Members Overview
    • About Our Members
      • About Our Members
      • In Memoriam
      • Regional Advisory Groups
      • Milestones
      • Newly Elected Members
    • Member Directory
    • Make a Gift
    • Membership FAQ
  • Giving
    • Giving Overview
    • Annual Fund
    • 100 for 100
    • Member Giving Circles
    • Life Member Class Gift
      • Life Member Class Gift
      • 2000 Life Member Class Gift
      • 1999 Life Member Class Gift
    • Sustaining Members
    • Ways to Give
    • Planned Giving
    • Law Firm Giving
    • Fundraising Disclosure Statement
    • Contact Us
  • News
    • News
    • Quarterly Newsletter
    • Podcast
    • Press Releases
    • Video Library
    • Annual Reports
    • ALI In the Courts
    • ALI CLE Programs
Donate
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Foreign Relations 4th Cited by D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
Home Foreign Relations 4th Cited by D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
  1. News
In the Courts

Foreign Relations 4th Cited by D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

February 24, 2020
Image Foreign Law Restatement4th.jpg

In a recent case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia cited the Restatement of the Law Fourth, The Foreign Relations Law of the United States, in holding that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia did not err in exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction over crimes committed by foreign nationals against U.S. law-enforcement officers on foreign soil.

In United States v. Garcia Sota, 948 F.3d 356 (D.C. Cir. 2020), two Mexican nationals who were connected to the illegal drug trade killed one U.S. law-enforcement officer and injured another in Mexico during an attempt to steal their vehicle. The defendants were charged with, among other things, violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), which criminalized the use of a firearm while committing a crime of violence. The district court entered judgment following a jury verdict against the defendants. On appeal, the defendants argued that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict them of violating § 924(c), because nothing in the statute evidenced congressional intent to grant extraterritorial jurisdiction to the statute.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed in part, holding that Congress intended for § 924(c) to apply to the use of firearms against U.S. officials on foreign soil in connection to drug trafficking. The court reasoned that § 924(c) “include[d] drug trafficking crimes as predicate offenses” and “specifically enumerate[d] 46 U.S.C. § 70503,” which criminalized drug acts that were “committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States” as crimes of violence. The court concluded that “these predicates provide[d] the necessary textual indication that Congress meant § 924(c) to apply overseas. . . .” The court observed that its holding did not “violate the law of nations,” because Restatement of the Law Fourth, The Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 402 and Restatement of the Law Third, The Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 412 allowed “a state to exercise jurisdiction to protect its officials overseas.”

More News

See All

State Court Adopts Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Economic Harm § 19

U.S. Supreme Court Cites Foreign Relations 3d

U.S. Supreme Court Cites Restatements of Contracts and Torts

Address

4025 Chestnut Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19104

215-243-1600

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
    Terms of Use
Donate

© Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved.