Marotta-Wurgler on Ending the Use of Customer Arbitration
A recent article published in the New York Times discusses Amazon’s change to its legal complaints process for its customers. Until recently, Amazon customers were required to pursue disputes with the company through a private arbitration process.
The article argues that companies began using the practice of arbitration as a way to prevent customers from participating in a class-action lawsuits. Companies use language in their contracts that mandates customers buying their services use the company’s arbitration process only. For many consumers making disputes, it does not make financial sense to hire a lawyer and pursue an arbitration claim as an individual. Legally, companies are allowed to do this by arguing that arbitration was fair for consumers. The Supreme Court has upheld the use of this legal technique.
Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, Reporter on the Consumer Contracts Restatement is quoted in the article, saying, “This is a big deal. For so long, the tide had been going the other way, with companies adding arbitration clauses to their contracts.”
Read the full article on NYTimes.com [subscription required].
- The abstract for 'Improving (and Avoiding) Interstate Interpretive Encounters' is available on The ALI Adviser:… https://t.co/sHIq24JfoF@AmLawInstSep 29
- . @daniellecitron has authored ‘The Fight for Privacy, Protecting Dignity, Identity and Love in our Digital Age,’ di… https://t.co/5V0wlofT0P@AmLawInstSep 29
- Sarah S. Vance of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana is the recipient of the 2022 Edward… https://t.co/YyUx80mxZY@AmLawInstSep 28
- . @DebroahNArcher is the next director of @nyulaw’s Clinical and Advocacy Programs, effective January 2023.… https://t.co/2TQaEXlszu@AmLawInstSep 26
- Following her retirement from the @uscourts, U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Margaret B Sey… https://t.co/FfZHzQAeyN@AmLawInstSep 22